Why Christianity is Not Simply Pauline ... No Matter What the Rabbis Say
A very dear Jewish friend once said to me that Christianity was not about Jesus but rather about Paul. This might come as a surprising statement to you until you look at the motivation for why my friend would hold to such an unusual view.
Jesus is seen throughout the world, and not only in Christendom, as a person of love and forgiveness. Jesus is attractive on a "religious" level. However, Jesus on this "religious" plane is not recognized as the unique and exclusive way to God.
Therefore, my friend's position is that Jesus came to reform Judaism and not to transform the world. She views Paul as the originator of Christianity because it provides an alternate response to the claims of Jesus' Messiahship. For if Paul was the real founder of Christianity, then one can appreciate Jesus' message without having to respond to the sacrificial gift of Jesus on the cross.
My friend did not come to this view in a spiritual vacuum. She came to this view because these attacks on both Jesus and Paul are not new. Therefore, this fallacy must be understood by Christians with a burden for Jewish people in order to develop an apologetic response in evangelism.
The first question to ask those who promote this view, and please know it also exists in the area of "Christian" scholarship, is when do they believe the Gospels were written? More than likely, they will believe that the books were written late 1st or early 2nd century and not by the men to whom they are ascribed. In other words, John did not write John. Peter did not write 1 and 2 Peter and Paul did not write most of the pastoral epistles. Their arguments are based upon a view of Scripture that is more along the lines of the Jesus Seminar than the truth of inerrancy that evangelicals uphold. The above statement is true with both many Jewish and "Christian" proponents who view that Christianity is all about Paul and not Jesus.
Second, you need to know that many of the rationales for their argument come from the work of Hyam Maccoby. Maccoby was a Jewish scholar whose life focus was apparently to denigrate Christian beliefs. He was a scholar but one tainted by an agenda - disproving the Christian faith. Therefore, arguments from Maccoby should be taken with "a grain of salt".
Third, the argument will be made that Jesus only intended to reform and not transform Judaism. They will argue that it was Paul who took liberties with Jesus' message and founded Christianity. The best response is to go to Deut. 18:18-19 and read the promise that another prophet would arise after Moses. Jesus stated that he was this prophet (John 3:14; 5:46; and the Transfiguration passages) and provides evidence of this claim. Jesus stated that He was God (Matt. 26:64; John 8:58; 10:30) and that this message was a realization not of the anticipated kingdom but of the kingdom of God/heaven (Acts 1:8). Jesus was both a reformer and a transformer. He took a man-designed Judaism and brought hope and eternity for the Jewish people and us as well.
Obviously, time and space are limited and prevent an in-depth study of the subject. Use these few hints as a discussion starter the next time you hear someone say that our faith is Pauline and not about Jesus. Nothing could be further from the truth. Shalom in Messiah Jesus' name! |